Introducing theHoney Bioactivity Index
Bioactive strength, measured.
Not claimed.
Two jars can pass every purity test and still differ substantially in available bioactive compounds such as phenols, antioxidants, flavonoids among many others. These are highly dependent on factors such as floral source, weather, harvest conditions and processing
Purity tells us the honey is real.
It tells us nothing about its strength.
Manuka honey faced the same challenge decades ago: a strong reputation for wound healing, but no reliable way to distinguish a genuinely potent jar from an ordinary one. That changed when researchers identified methylglyoxal (MGO) as the compound responsible for its characteristic antibacterial activity and developed a grading system to measure it directly.
Today, a growing body of research suggests that several Moroccan monofloral honeys exhibit bioactive properties comparable to, and in some cases exceeding, those reported for Manuka. Unlike Manuka, whose commercial grading systems are built primarily around MGO, Moroccan honeys appear to derive their bioactivity from a far more diverse range of naturally occurring compounds, highlighting the need for a broader framework to measure and understand their bioactive strength.
We're building the scientific foundation for Moroccan honey
Our methodology follows three sequential phases, each answering a different scientific question.
How bioactively strong is this honey?
Which compound is responsible?
What is its biological relevance?
Tiers are set by Honey Bioactivity Index (HBI) score, calculated from TPC and DPPH results.
Silver
Good
HBI 1.9+
Genuine, measurable bioactivity. Every batch released under the Tayab name meets this standard at minimum.
Gold
Exceptional
HBI 2.5+
Bioactivity meaningfully above the Silver range, placing a batch among the stronger honeys we test.
Diamond
Top Tier
HBI 3.5+
Among the highest bioactivity range we've measured across tested batches to date.